{"id":366,"date":"2004-11-25T00:47:43","date_gmt":"2004-11-25T00:47:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/?p=366"},"modified":"2004-11-25T00:47:43","modified_gmt":"2004-11-25T00:47:43","slug":"voto_electrnico_sospechas_en_f","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/2004\/11\/voto_electrnico_sospechas_en_f\/","title":{"rendered":"Voto electr\u00f3nico: sospechas en Florida (Act. II)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Seg\u00fan un reciente art\u00edculo publicado en \u00ab[\u00abWired News\u00bb:http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/evote\/0,2645,65757,00.html]\u00bb, un estudio estad\u00edstico de la Universidad de Berkeley ha concluido que las m\u00e1quinas de voto electr\u00f3nico en el estado de Florida habr\u00edan dado a George W. Bush **260.000** votos de m\u00e1s. El mismo estudio en el estado de Ohio no encontr\u00f3 discrepancias significativas.<br \/>\nLos investigadores no han hecho ning\u00fan juicio sobre las causas de estas discrepancias. El peri\u00f3dico \u00ab[\u00abThe NewStandard\u00bb:http:\/\/newstandardnews.net\/alivewires\/election2004\/content\/?show_item=1250]\u00bb est\u00e1 investigando estas y \u00abotras\u00bb:http:\/\/newstandardnews.net\/content\/?action=show_item&#038;itemid=1223 posibles evidencias de fraude.<br \/>\n\u00bfPucherazo?<br \/>\n**Actualizaci\u00f3n**<br \/>\nEnlace a la versi\u00f3n en pdf del art\u00edculo: \u00abAqu\u00ed\u00bb:http:\/\/ucdata.berkeley.edu\/new_web\/VOTE2004\/election04_WPwappendices.pdf<br \/>\nConclusiones del art\u00edculo:<\/p>\n<div class=\"citation\">\n**Finding**<br \/>\nElectronic voting raised President Bush\u2019s advantage from the tiny edge he held in 2000 to a clearer margin of victory in 2004. The impact of e-voting was not uniform, however. Its impact was proportional to the Democratic support in the county, i.e., it was especially large in Broward, Palm Beach, and Miami-Dade. The evidence for this is the statistical significance of terms in our model that gauge the average impact of e-voting across Florida\u2019s 67 counties and statistical interaction effects that gauge its larger-than-average effect in counties where Vice President Gore did the best in 2000 and slightly negative effect in the counties where Mr. Bush did the best in 2000.<br \/>\nThe state-wide impact of these disparities due to electronic voting<br \/>\namount to 130,000 votes if we assume a \u201cghost vote\u201d mechanism and twice that \u2013 260,000 votes \u2013 if we assume that a vote misattributed to one candidate should have been counted for the other.\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Seg\u00fan un reciente art\u00edculo publicado en \u00ab[\u00abWired News\u00bb:http:\/\/www.wired.com\/news\/evote\/0,2645,65757,00.html]\u00bb, un estudio estad\u00edstico de la Universidad de Berkeley ha concluido que las m\u00e1quinas de voto electr\u00f3nico en el estado de Florida habr\u00edan dado a George W. Bush **260.000** votos de m\u00e1s. El mismo estudio en el estado de Ohio no encontr\u00f3 discrepancias significativas. Los investigadores no han&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/2004\/11\/voto_electrnico_sospechas_en_f\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Leer m\u00e1s &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Voto electr\u00f3nico: sospechas en Florida (Act. II)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualidad"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/366\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/junjan.org\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}